Friday, March 18, 2005

Schiavo case

I wish someone would ask THIS question of Congress:
Why is the federal government interceding in someone's marriage? With all the talk about protecting the sactity of marriage from harm because two people of the same sex wish to form a civil/official union, will the Feds now tell us the new meaning of "marriage?" Does it mean the husband or wife cannot legally act on the behalf of their spouse?
Or can ANYONE go ask for a subpoena when in-laws disagree with what two married people are doing?THAT seems to be lost in the Schiavo case. Typically, a few Congressmen was merely reacting to political headlines (Gosh what a shock!) and making hay while the Florida sun shines. Where were they 10 years ago when this issue first arose?Answer? Looking at poll numbers of course. Today, it's a hot button issue and guarantees facec time on TV. It's a disgusting situation for EVERYONE involved.

No comments: